Technology and its Effects on Privacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Technology and its Effects on Privacy - Essay Example The Internet has played a major role in making this happen, since most people from different world regions will easily link up today by using the E-mail and other social network sites, including Facebook and MySpace. However, the use of information and information transmission through technology use has resulted in major problems regarding ethics and jurisdiction. These problems are mainly concerned with the right of privacy and the right of access to information, which are threatened by the current free flow of information, as well as the safeguarding of the financial interests of the owners of intellectual property. This essay mainly focuses on how people lose their privacy by putting all their information online, including in social network sites such as Facebook, and how this and similar technology influence people negatively, thus, endangering the human race. The present generation is known to be dependent on technology more than the past generations. Therefore, most of the vari ous problems that arise in the world today are based on technology. Unlike the past decades where technology was used in moderation, the present generation has informationalized most of its activities. According to Coughlan, this rampant use and increasing inventions in technology put the human race in danger. The overuse and misuse of technology by humans might lead to the extinction of the human race in future (n.pag.). Therefore, in regard to the privacy issue, various technologies today infringe people’s privacy, obtaining their personal information, which is highly sensitive. Additionally, different countries get the sensitive online information about other countries, which they consider their foes, through the Internet. Therefore, the party that retrieved the information online might use this information for different purposes. Nonetheless, a negative and malicious use of this information might result in negative effects for the individual or the country that was tracke d. Coughlan notes that today, computer technology can manipulate the real world, and, therefore, misguided intentions of computer use might be detrimental to the human race. With an increased advancement in technology, which might be lethal if misused, the humanity of this generation poses a threat to its own survival (Coughlan n.pag.). The issue of privacy has existed in the world since the development of information technology, computing, as well as the digital media. Today, social computing, email, mobile data, cookies, GPS, and networked video and audio capture among others are the examples of technologies, which have a negative impact on the users regarding their privacy (Lohr n.pag.). These technologies allow to mine the user’s information, as some of them monitor and keep surveillance of communication and data. In addition, the people using these technologies make it easier for their identity to be established, as they post their personal information and share it with other users. According to Lohr, most online activities a person is engaged in often lead to the diminishing of their level of privacy (n.pag.). For instance, Internet sites such as Facebook and Twitter require one to share most of their personal information such as birthday details with other friends. In this case, most people share their photos, photos of their families, gossipping at their work place and school, among other social and personal information. According to Lohr, when people engage in such self-revelation, it becomes easier for computers to assemble their information

Economics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 5

Economics - Essay Example The works by Prebisch (1947; 1949) and Singher (1950) attempted to explain economic growth based on the differences in products produced by different nations. The less developed nations according to these theories have to purchase the manufactured goods from the Northern nations at prices in excess of what of what they get for selling their primary goods (to the Northern nations). This ultimately adversely affects the economic growth of the less developed nations and thus they remain less developed (Todaro, 2003). These theories thus argue for promoting import-substituting policies for economic growth. Alternative theories by Harrod (1939) and advanced by Kregel (1980) capture the dynamics of economic growth by assuming that it is determined endogenously by the saving and investment decisions of firms. In this model, the growth rates put forward are actual, warranted and natural growth rates. Based on this approach, the long run growth rate is determined by the closed economy social saving rate rather than net exports. However, this model has been criticised for showing the possibility of unstable growth in a capitalist economy (Moudud, 2000). It has been shown that though there can be instability to some extent for the growth path, its extent is restricted by many endogenous factors in a capitalist economy (Moudud, 2000). 3. Conclusion In this essay, the discussion shows that low savings rate alone cannot explain the differences between developed and developing nations. By improving saving rates alone, developing nations cannot catch up with the West. Many other factors discussed above determine the differences between these nations. 1. Introduction The relationship between free trade and economic growth has been a topic of debate for the academicians and policy makers in the recent years. In this essay, the arguments for and against free trade are discussed. 2. Arguments for and Against Free Trade Greater availability of cheaper goods from abroad will lower t he domestic price level, since the consumption bundle used to compute broad inflation measures includes imported goods. The magnitude of this effect depends on the share of imports in the consumption bundle of the representative household.Also as the economy opens up the shocks to the price level due to the domestic farm sector; output fluctuations are likely to ease which may diminish the price fluctuations (Jin, 2000 etc). As per the Dutch disease hypothesis (Collier and Gunning, 1999) and the political economy models (Alesina and Perotti, 1994), trade openness can affect fiscal deficits through the instability of government revenue. First, countries with an outward-looking strategy have higher levels of competition, are less corrupt (Ades and Di Tella, 1999) and have higher fiscal balances and lower fiscal deficit. Second, trade openness increases income inequalities which enhances the demand of public goods (Alesina and Perotti, 1994) and, simultaneously, reduces the ability of governments to collect taxes. Third, trade policy could reduce government revenue in the short run (Bean, 1999), which could occur when increases in openness result from a reduction in tariffs. However, for a given level of tariffs, government revenue from taxes is an increasing function of trade openness. Thus, in the

Information Gathering Obu Essay Example for Free

Information Gathering Obu Essay Every Research Report requires information as the basis for analysis. Information sources can be categorised as either primary or secondary data. There is no requirement for you to collect primary data within your Research Report; it is wholly acceptable to undertake your Research Report using only secondary data. The difference between primary and secondary data is identified below. Primary data is original data that has been collected by a researcher by whatever means appropriate in the answer of a specific research question. . e. it has been collected specifically for the Research Report. Examples of primary data include questionnaires, interviews, e-mail contacts and surveys. If you decide to collect primary data as part of your research work, then you should state and justify the following: ? The data collection techniques you intend to use e. g. questionnaires, interviews. ? Your sample size and an outline of your sampling strategy. ? The method you will use to select your sample and the likely response rate. If you intend to collect primary data from staff within your chosen organisation you must obtain permission to do this from a senior member of staff within the organisation. You should do this as early as possible during your Research Report, since if you are denied access to your desired information sources you may have to reconsider how to meet your project objectives and research questions. Secondary data is data that has been collected by others for their own purposes, but which may be used by a researcher for his or her different purposes. Examples of secondary data include reference material, books, CD ROMs and financial statements. You should always evaluate the appropriateness and relevance of secondary data sources. Information included in internet sources may not be reliable from an academic perspective and may not be appropriate for use in your Research Report. If you decide to use secondary data as part of your research work, you should state and justify your choice to do so. Where you use published secondary data you must provide precise references using the Harvard Referencing System. This is discussed in more detail in the following section. You must retain all of the information that you collected during your project work until you have received official notification of your RAP grade from Oxford Brookes University. This includes any questionnaire responses, copies of financial statements, extracts from journals, reports, magazines etc. Oxford Brookes University may wish to ask you to provide additional evidence of your information gathering following the marking of your Research and Analysis project.

Importance of Accounting Information in Business Development

Importance of Accounting Information in Business Development Describe how accounting information helps shareholders and lenders to make decisions concerning the operations and performance of the entity. Accounting information can be used by shareholders and lenders to look at an entitys financial position and whether it is viable to invest or lend to the entity. If the performance of a company has been poor and there is no indication of this improving, a potential shareholder will not invest in the company as there is nothing to gain from the investment and a lender will not loan money to the company due to the risk of not seeing that money again. If however, the company is turning a profit, indicates that it will continue to do so in the future and has a great many assets, both shareholders and lenders will consider investing in the company in line with their personal interests. List five/six stakeholders of accounting information. Describe the information requirements for each one; for example, lenders would need information regarding the businesss ability to repay debt and service a loan. Stakeholder Information Requirements Banks Whether the company in its capacity can repay a loan should it decide to take one out. Employees Whether the company can support an employees lifestyle and longevity in the company. The employee may also seek opportunities in the company such as promotion Governments The about of tax the company should be paying and whether the company will pay any more tax in the future. Community Whether the company is an asset to the community, providing jobs and resources to other organisations within the community such as sponsorship. Consumers Whether the company is providing quality products or services and not cutting corners on the quality of the products. They may also like to see whether their favourite product will continue to be available. Suppliers Whether the company can fulfil the financial obligation of purchasing products from the supplier so the supplier itself can make a profit. Darby Davis is considering purchasing a sushi bar in the inner Brisbane suburb of Paddington. Outline the importance of a business plan for Darby and the type of accounting information she will require to assist her in making the decision. Business plans are important for new businesses as they provide the background and the purpose of the forthcoming business. In reference to the textbook, All business plans, whatever their structure, should cover the key issues of marketing, operations and finance[i]. Specifically, a business plan should include strategy including a background profile, marketing strategy, timeline of business implementation, financial backing and any other issues the business may have. How can the professional accounting bodies assist in standard setting? Accounting firms can assist companies in many ways with their accounting methodology. This can include identifying technical issues, educating members, students and accountants of the company. By doing this, the accounting firms can ensure that the rules enforced by the AASB (Australian Accounting Standards Board), IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) and the GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) are being met with compliance. What is meant by business sustainability? Business sustainability is the act of preserving aspects of the business for the present and future. This can include social, environmental and financial aspects of the business. Outline the benefits for organisations in considering business sustainability. By complying with business sustainability, the business is not only benefiting themselves by making plans to preserve their company but also having an impact externally. This can include within the local community, where the business is providing jobs to people. Environmentally, where the business is applying green strategy to benefit the future of the planet. And as one last example, to the shareholders who have invested in the company. By accepting sustainable practices, the business will be able to pay dividends to those shareholders and those shareholders will continue to invest in the company. What are the three pillars of sustainability? The three pillars of sustainability are: Social (People), Environmental (Planet) and Economic (Profit). Outline the possible consequences for an entity that breaches its social contract. When a business breaches its social contract, the company risks being rejected or boycotted on a social level. Society has an impact on how the business conducts itself within the public, and when a company breaches that expectation they may see negative effects from members of the wider community consequently. Identify some social performance aspects on which entities report. Businesses may report on several social performance aspects. These can include: Ethical and Integral Performance Environmental Performance Community Participation and Sponsorship Community Employment Improvement of Stakeholder relations Illustrate with an example how sole traders and partners are taxed in Australia. What are the advantages or disadvantages compared to paying company tax? Sole traders and partnerships both have their tax assessed as their personal income, this is treated as tax out of their salaries. This means that they do not have to submit to formal reporting standards about their tax, but many use MYOB or Quicken to keep track of their accounts. A disadvantage of this is that the tax rate can be higher than that of a company. Currently the tax rate of a company is 30% and the personal rate can vary on how much they make annually. [i] Birt, Jacqueline, Keryn Chalmers, Suzanne Maloney, Albie Brooks, Judy Oliver. Accounting: Business Reporting for Decision Making, 6th Edition. John Wiley Sons Australia,, 08/2016. VitalBook file.

Internet Predators Essay -- Internet Predation

Internet Predators In recent years, the Internet has become the number one choice for doing research. A person can find information on just about anything. There are websites devoted to cooking recipes, musicians, schools, and pornography. Many schools will even allow students to apply for admission over the Internet. Schools such as California State University, Northridge give students an option to register for classes through the school website, making it quick and easy to get classes. The Internet is truly the "information superhighway." Not everyone who accesses the Internet uses it for research. Many people, especially young people use the Internet for e-mail and chatting. Chat rooms and instant messengers are becoming more prevalent on the Internet. Internet service providers such as America Online (AOL) have chat rooms where people from all over the world can chat about almost anything. AOL has chat rooms for teens, singles, religious groups, sports, and many other topics. If a person in a chat room likes what someone else in the chat room is saying, he or she can send a private message. If the two people get along, they can add each other to their buddy list so they can always talk when both are online. However, a problem may arise if a person does not use this way of chatting responsibly. After all, does anyone really know whom they are talking to unless they know the person personally? Common sense must be used at all times. The Internet can be very deceptive. A person needs to use extreme caution when giving out personal information to a person they are chatting to. Many people forget about the dangers of Internet chat. People can be too trusting. The people who use chat rooms and instant messengers sometimes... ...rsonal Interview. Pennsylvania. 26 April 2002. Dean, Katie. "The Epidemic of Cyberstalking." Wired News. May 1, 2000. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,35728,00.html (April 24, 2002). Hartman, Rachel R. "Cyberstalking and Internet Safety FAQ." http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,35728,00.htm (April 24, 2002). Magid, Lawrence J. "Teen Safety on the Information Highway." Safeteens.com. http://www.safekids.com/safeteens/safeteens.htm (April 24, 2002). Talton, Trista. "Internet Predators Subject of Meeting." Wilmington Star. August 23, 2001. http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/news/stories/3084newsstorypage.html (April 24, 2002). Tarbox, Katie. Oprah. Television Program. ABC, Chicago. 17 April 2002. Turkle, Sherry. "Who Am We?" Presence of Others. Ed. Andrea A. Lunsford and John J. Rusziewicz. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2000. 442-458.

The Plant World Essay -- Environment, Plant Species, Plant Communicati

Introduction Plants exhibit exceptionally intelligent behaviour when it comes to interactions with their environment. They can detect perceived threats, then convey warning signals to other plants via chemical signaling. Forewarned plants will then assemble their defenses against these potential threats, thus, increasing their chance of survival and reproduction. Communication and competition are common occurrences among the plant world. Another brilliantly, almost inconceivable capability plants possess is the ability to recognize coexisting family members within their home range. These intelligent life forms realize that if family members compete less with each other by allocation of their resources, their group will do better overall. This is a strategy utilized by many species, especially plants, to eliminate competition within their community in nature (Mancuso 2006). Competition can occur between members of the same or different species. The involved individuals are negatively affected by other individuals that have the same living requirements, such as food or space. Inter-specific competition transpires when members of different species compete for a particular resource. Intra-specific competition arises when members of the same species compete with one another for a particular resource (Encyclopedia Britannica 2010). In this experiment we concentrate on inter-specific competition. We measured the effect of competitor density on the growth of plants in order to observe the outcome of inter-specific competition. In set one (of two), our group utilized allelopathic rye grass (Secale cereal L.) as our competitor species. In set two, we made use of non-allelopathic oats (Avena fatua var. sativa) as our competitor spec... ...ass soil. This demonstrates that a pathogen may influence allelopathy between plants and that rust may enhance ryegrass allelopathy against clover (Mattner 2001). Our results supported the alternative hypothesis which states that the density and weight of rye or oats (competitor species) had a significant effect on the 1/w of the clover (indicator species) under normal conditions. This proves that non-legumes win when in an inter-specific competition with a legume species and allelopathic chemicals negatively affect indicator species during inter-specific competition (Cain 2008). Errors that could have occurred when designing this experiment include possible uneven distribution light, water, or temperature fluctuations. For future research I would suggest observing the effects of allelopathy and symbiotic bacteria among different legume and non-legume species.

A Comparative Analysis of Overstock and Amazon

Financial Reporting, Analysis and Ethics: A Comparative Analysis of Overstock. com and Amazon Robert Baird BU7545 Fall 2011 Financial Reporting, Analysis and Ethics: A Comparative Analysis of Overstock. com and Amazon Robert Baird BU7545 Fall 2011 Table of Contents| | | Executive Summary| 2| | | Company and Industry Information| 3| | | Accounting Issues| 6| | | Accounting Policies and Disclosure Practices| 9| | | Financial Statement Analysis| 10| | | Corporate Governance| 13| | | Conclusion| 15| | |References| 18| | | Appendices| 21| Executive Summary This paper covers the accounting errors related to freight costs that led Overstock. com in 2006 to restate its financial statements for 2002, 2003, 2004 and quarterly reports for 2004 and 2005, and the subsequent SEC investigation in which they were cleared of wrongdoing. It also covers a second restatement from 2009, in which the financial statements for 2009 and 2008 were restated and another SEC investigation related to those restat ements.The paper details a glaring problem for Overstock related to its accounting controls and even the company’s admittance in its annual report that it does not have an appropriate number of qualified accounting professionals able to produce financial statements that are free of material errors. Overstock is compared against a direct competitor, Amazon, who although is a much larger company that Overstock, has become the standard in the industry against which all other companies are judged.The financial statements and financial ratios from 2006-2008 of both Amazon and Overstock are shown in comparison with one another to offer some insight into the strengths and weaknesses of each company and to evaluate their performance, and include consolidated statements of operations and consolidated balance sheets from 2005-2008 and common-size statements of operations and balance sheets for each company from 2005-2008, as well as trend statements of operations and balance sheets for each company from 2005-2008.The paper also examines the corporate structure of each company, including the board of directors, the different board committees that exist and compensation practices for senior company executives. The paper concludes that Overstock must put in place the proper controls and hire competent accounting and auditing professionals to ensure the validity of their financial statements. Company and Industry Information Overstock. com (Overstock) was incorporated in Utah in December 1998, originally as D2-Discounts Direct, Inc. , later reincorporated in the state of Delaware in 2002 and changed its name to Deals. om, Inc. in 1999. Overstock adopted its present name on October 25, 1999 and is based out of Salt Lake City, Utah. Overstock is an online retailer that sells discount merchandise to consumers through its online website. According to Mergent Online, â€Å"Overstock. com is an online retailer providing discount brand name, non-brand name and closeout mer chandise, including bed-and-bath goods, home decor, kitchenware, furniture, watches and jewelry apparel, electronics and computers, sporting goods, and designer accessories, among other products† (2011).Overstock also sells â€Å"run books, magazines, compact discs, digital video disk and video games† (Mergent Online, 2011). The company conducts direct business, in which it orders are fulfilled at Overstock’s warehouses in Salt Lake City, Utah and shipped to final consumers or business, and business with fulfillment partners, which occurs when Overstock sells another manufacturers or retailers merchandise on their website and those third parties pack and ship orders. Overstock, however, does â€Å"handle returns and customer service related to substantially all orders placed through its website† (Mergent Online, 2011).According to Mergent Online, as of the end of 2010, Overstock â€Å"sells to customers in over 90 countries† but â€Å"does not have sales operations outside the United States† and â€Å"is using a United States based third party to provide logistics and fulfillment for all international orders† (2011). Overstock does ship goods to suppliers on consignment, and includes car and real estate listings, insurance quotes and an online auction service on its website. Amazon was originally incorporated in Washington in 1994 and later reincorporated in the state of Delaware in 1996. Amazon. om (Amazon), like Overstock is an online retailer that sells all sorts of different products and merchandise on its website. According to Mergent Online, the products on Amazon’s website â€Å"primarily include merchandise and content purchased for resale from vendors and those provided by party sellers, and it also manufactures and sells the Kindle e-reader† and they also provide â€Å"services such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), fulfillment, miscellaneous marketing and promotional agreements, such as onli ne advertising and co-branded credit cards. Amazon consists of two separate business segments, North America and International.North America consists of â€Å"amounts earned from retail sales of consumer products (including from sellers) and subscriptions through North America-focused websites such as www. amazon. com and www. amazon. ca and include amounts earned from AWS† and includes the export sales from the above mentioned websites (Mergent Online, 2011). The International business segment consists of â€Å"amounts earned from retail sales of consumer products (including from sellers) and subscriptions through internationally focused locations† and the segment includes â€Å"export sales from these internationally ased locations (including export sales from these sites to customers in the United States and Canada), but excludes export sales from the company’s United States and Canadian locations† (Mergent Online, 2011). According to Standard & Poorâ €™s NetAdvantage, Amazon â€Å"has virtually unlimited online shelf space, and can offer customers a vast selection of products through an efficient search and retrieval interface† (2011). In addition to being the seller of record for a broad range of new products, Amazon allows other businesses and individuals to sell new, used and collectible products on its websites through its Merchant and Amazon Marketplace programs† in which Amazon â€Å"earns fixed fees, sales commissions and/or per unit activity fees,† as well as serving developers and â€Å"enterprises of all sizes through AWS, which provides access to technology infrastructure that developers can use to virtually enable any type of business† (S&P NetAdvantage, 2011).The online retail industry is an industry that is thriving as more and more consumer purchase products online. As the supply chain and logistics processes have become increasingly advanced and streamlined, online retailing has tak en major strides in the past two decades. According to the Standard & Poor’s Industry Surveys (Computers: Consumer Services & the Internet), â€Å"United States online retail sales (excluding the auto, travel and prescription drug categories) increased 13% in 2010 to $17. billion† and â€Å"improvements in multi-channel initiatives, better online merchandising, more personalized offerings and increasingly sophisticated marketing efforts drove growth in 2010,† while S&P Capital IQ forecasts internet retail sales will rise to 11% in 2011 (2011, p. 10) . The S&P Industry Survey also states that â€Å"worldwide business-to-consumer (B2C) internet spending may increase from $708 billion in 2010 to $1. trillion in 2014† and the three most popular categories of merchandise sold online in 2009 were (in order) â€Å"apparel, accessories and footwear; software and peripherals; and consumer electronics,† and a â€Å"number of exclusive online retailers have also been successful, among (them) major publicly traded online retailers like Amazon. com Inc. and Overstock. com Inc. † (2011, p. 17). Amazon, however, is far and away the leader of its industry. At first it seemed like a business model that was destined to ail, but is has since become â€Å"the model† for its industry and â€Å"has been the breakaway leader in global e-commerce for a number of years† (S&P Industry Surveys, 2011, p. 18). Overstock is trying to emulate the strategy used by Amazon, but it is difficult for any online retailer to differentiate itself from a company like Amazon, with its huge market share and market capitalization. Amazon is an incredibly tough act to follow and according to the S&P Industry Survey, it is predicted that in 2011, Amazon â€Å"will achieve its sixth straight year with revenue growth of greater than 25%† (2011, p. 18).Amazon has â€Å"achieved strong and sustained success by continuing to focus on its customers † and â€Å"has looked to innovate and take risks, despite potential near-term negative impacts to its financial performance† (S&P Industry Surveys, 2011, p. 18). Accounting Issues Overstock has had numerous instances of accounting and control errors that have resulted in restatements of financial statements and probes by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In 2006, Overstock announced that it would restate its previously reported financial statements going back to 2002 due to an error in the way it accounted for its freight costs.According to the Deseret News on March 1, 2006, â€Å"the accounting errors relate to how the Salt Lake-based company immediately expensed inbound freight costs in the periods they were incurred, instead of capitalizing such costs as part of inventory and expensing them as it sold off the inventory† and the error â€Å"effects annual financial reports for 2002, 2003, 2004 and quarterly reports for 2004 and 2005à ¢â‚¬  (2006, p. E1). The correction of the freight cost error actually increased the inventory by $3. million as of the third quarter of 2005, and lowered the net losses for fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004. In an interview on CNBC in 2006, Overstock CEO said of the restatement â€Å"our restatement was $3. 5 million to the good† and â€Å"our auditors have said that we understated our results by $3. 5 million† (CEO Wire, 2006). He went on to say in the interview with Becky Quick on CNBC that â€Å"it turns out we had – turns out that we have understated our performance, that our books are too conservative, is what the auditors have said† (CEO Wire, 2006).Overstock vice president of corporate affairs, echoed this sentiment in an interview with the Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, saying â€Å"when you look at what this restatement is really, it is positive† (Sims, 2006, p. 1). In an interview with the Salt Lake Tribune, Overstock President Jon athan Johnson said of the accounting errors: â€Å"When we order comforters, we pay the manufacturer and the freight bill. We’ve been accounting for the freight bill as we paid it, expensing it. We should have been capitalizing the freight bill as we sold the goods, as opposed to when we actually paid it† (Keahey, 2009).These are just some examples from the corporate officers at Overstock that they just clearly do not get it, and do not understand the impact of a financial restatement. The Deseret News describes the effects of the accounting error as follows, â€Å"for 2005, the accounting change will narrow the reported net loss by $1. 8 million for the quarter ended September 30 and by $592,000 for the quarter ended June 30† and â€Å"widen the net loss by $107,000 for the quarter ended March 31. For 2004, the correction will lower the full-year loss by $461,000.The accounting change will also reduce the net losses for the 2002 and 2003 fiscal years† (2 006, p. E1). This restatement led to an investigation of Overstock by the SEC resulting in a subpoena from the SEC for internal documents relating to â€Å"its accounting policies, targets and projections† (Wall Street Journal, 2006). On June 6, 2008 the SEC informed Overstock that it had completed its investigation â€Å"of the company and its officers and does not intend to recommend any enforcement action† (Financial Wire, 2008).Overstock apparently did not learn much from the above mentioned restatement and subsequent SEC investigation, and on September 15, 2009, Overstock received yet another notice from the SEC, putting the company on notice that the SEC was â€Å"conducting an investigation concerning Overstock’s previously-announced restatements of its financial statements in 2006 and 2008 and other matters† and the subpoena that accompanied the notice â€Å"covers documents related to the restatements and also to Overstock’s billings to i ts partners in the fourth quarter of 2008 and related collections, and Overstock’s accounting for and implementation of software relating to its accounting for customer refunds and credit, including offsets to partners, and related matters† (PR Newswire, 2009). In February 2010, Overstock announced it was restating its financial statements for 2008 and 2009, shifting $1. 8 million of income from 2009 to 2008. Overstock attributed this restatement to â€Å"some accounting confusion involving other companies that sell goods on its website† and a related problem involving incorrect invoices from a freight vendor† (Deseret News, 2010, p. A10).Overstock also stated in a filing with the SEC that it was â€Å"applying different accounting standards for its stock option plans that will mean decreased income of $350,000 for 2008 and about $900,000 for 2009† (Harvey, 2010). As if the restatement of financial reports was not bad enough, Overstock admitted to a â€Å"deficiency in its financial controls related to its relationship with certain business partners† and informed the SEC that â€Å"management’s report on internal control over financial reporting for fiscal 2008 can no longer be relied upon† (Harvey, 2010). On his blog on Phil’s Stock World, Sam Antar (who discloses that he is a convicted felon and former CPA who now works closely with government and law enforcement agencies in cases of white-collar crimes and regularly refers cases to them) wrote that â€Å"in 2009†¦Overstock. om violated GAAP in accounting for its recoveries of certain offsetting costs and reimbursements amounts due to the company from its fulfillment partners (suppliers) who were under-billed in previous reporting periods† and that Overstock should have â€Å"restated its financial reports to recognize income when those offsetting costs and reimbursements were actually earned by the company in those previous reporting periods† (Phil’s Stock World, 2010). Antar claims that accounting errors are bordering on criminal and that the company â€Å"improperly recognized income as those amounts were collected in future accounting periods on a non-GAAP cash basis† and that Overstock even reported profits in the fourth quarter of 2008 when they should have reported a loss under GAAP (Phil’s Stock World, 2010).Antar made some even stronger claims against Overstock, saying that accounting errors have become commonplace at Overstock at that the officers of the company do not seemed interested or inclined to put the proper controls in place to detect these errors. Antar writes that â€Å"so far, from 1999 to Q3 2009 every single financial report issued by Overstock. com had to be restated at least once, sometimes twice or even three times to correct material accounting errors† with the company even claiming that the last two restatements were caused by â€Å"technology proble ms† (Phil’s Stock World, 2010). In the 2009 10-K issued by Overstock it stated that Overstock’s â€Å"information technology program change and program development controls were inadequately designed to prevent changes in our accounting systems which led to the failure to appropriately capture and accurately process data† (2010, p. 18).The two previously mentioned instances of financial report restatements mean that in 2006, the annual financial statements for 2002, 2003 and 2004 were restated; then the 2006 financial statements were restated again along with the statements for 2008. Both restatements had little or no effect on the stock price of the company and after each restatement was announced the stock price either fall modestly or even went up slightly. Accounting Policies and Disclosure Practices As shown in the numerous instances of accounting errors and restatements, Overstock clearly has an issue with its internal controls over financial reporti ng to detect basic GAAP errors before their financial statement are released to the SEC.In its 2010 10-K, Overstock acknowledges that they have a problem and states, â€Å"we lacked a sufficient number of accounting professionals with the necessary knowledge, experience and training to adequately account for and perform adequate supervisory reviews of significant transactions that resulted in misapplications of GAAP† (2010, p. 22). This is a fascinating admittance by a major publicly traded company that it simply does not have accountants to properly produce correct financial statements free of significant accounting errors. Amazon, for its part, is the leader in online retailing and a much larger company with a global footprint that outstretches most companies, and especially that of Overstock, yet their accounting policies are sound.There exists nothing in their annual reports to the SEC that outlines anything of the sort that Overstock has admitted related to not having a sufficient number of accountants. The information listed in their financial reports seems to be standard language related to GAAP. Both companies, Amazon and Overstock account for their inventory using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, valued at lower of cost or market value and depreciate their fixed assets on a straight-line basis. Financial Statement Analysis In its 2009 10-K report, Amazon gives an interesting overview to its business. It states that its’ â€Å"primary source of revenue is the sale of a wide range of products and services to customers† and that their â€Å"financial focus is on long-term, sustainable growth in free cash flow per share† (2009, p. 21).It also states that â€Å"we seek to reduce our variable costs per unit and work to leverage our fixed costs† and â€Å"because of our model we are able to turn over inventory quicker and have a cash-generating operating cycle† (2009, p. 22). Amazon’s inventory turnover, as shown in the financial ratios in the appendix, was 11. 46 times in 2008 (consistent with 11. 06 times in 2007 and 11. 44 times in 2006) and with a receivables turnover of 24. 95 times in 2008 and payables turnover of 5. 98 times in 2008, they have a sufficient operating cycle and cash conversion cycle. Overstock’s inventory turnover was 31. 68 times in 2008, up from 12. 21 times in 2006, and means their sales are stronger and they are moving inventory at a much better rate. The receivables turnover for Overstock 75. 49 times in 2008 and accounts payable turnover of 12. 53 times in 2008.Amazon gets more bang for their buck than Overstock, and is able to leverage their considerable size and operational capacity to achieve significant returns on their assets, equity and income. In 2008, Amazon’s return on assets (ROA) was 8. 69 percent, compared with Overstock’s -6. 23 percent ROA. Overstock’s ROA has improved from 2006 when it was -34. 43 percent but be cause of consistent net losses their return ratios are negative. Overstock’s return on equity (ROE) was -105. 88 percent, and improvement from -131. 38 percent in 2006, but nothing compared to Amazon’s ROE of 33. 25 percent in 2008. Amazon also has a significant return on operating income (ROI) of 28. 93 percent in 2008, as contrasted with Overstock’s ROI of -12. 82 percent in 2008 (up from -57. 89 percent in 2006).A look at the common-size consolidated statement of operations of Amazon and Overstock (restated) offers some insights into the considerable differences between a company with the size and stature of Amazon and a company that would like to achieve that status, like Overstock. Amazon had a gross profit in 2008 of 22. 3 percent of sales (consistent to the gross profit for 2005 through 2007), whereas Overstock had a gross profit of 17. 1 percent of revenue (consistent with gross profit percentages from 2005 through 2007). Both Amazon and Overstock had si milar total operating expenses, 17. 9 percent of sales for Amazon in 2008 and 18. 4 percent of revenue for Overstock in 2008. The numbers that are the most telling are the income statistics, with Amazon having a net income as a percentage of sales of 3. 4 percent in 2008, whereas Overstock had a net loss s a percentage of revenue of -1. 5 percent, which improved significantly from 2006 when it was -13. 7 percent and 2007 when it was -6. 3 percent. The trend consolidate statements of operations for Amazon and Overstock (restated), in which the base year of 2005 equals 100 percent, the discrepancies between a global leader in its industry, Amazon, and its competitor, Overstock, are even more compelling. Net sales for Amazon more than doubled from 2005 to 2008, and in 2008 net sales were 225. 7 percent of the net sales from 2005. Total revenue for Overstock was only up slightly from 2005 to 2008, and in 2008 total revenues were 104. 4 percent of the total revenues from 2005.Amazon also doubled its gross profit from 2005 in, up 209. 4 percent, whereas Overstock’s gross profit in 2008 was 122. 3 percent of its’ 2005 gross profit. Overstock’s total operating expenses stayed relatively close to their 2005 level in 2006, 2007 and 2008, only rising slightly. Amazon, on the other hand had a significant increase in total operating expenses. Operating expenses in 2008 were 213. 3 percent of the 2005 total operating expenses. Net income for Amazon for 2008 was 179. 7 percent of its 2005 net income and increased from 132. 6 in 2007 and from a very off year in 2006, when net income was 52. 9 percent of the previous year 2005.Overstock has lowered its net losses, and in 2008 the net loss was half (50. 8 percent) of the 2005 level, and they too had a rough year in 2006 when the net loss was four times (428. 5 percent) that of 2005. Analysis of the restated common-size consolidate balance sheet for Overstock and the common-size consolidate balance sheet for Amazon show that both companies have a similar number of current assets, as would be expected from two companies that sell products online and have significant sales and inventory turnover, but Overstock has more cash and cash equivalents when compared to Amazon. Overstock had, as a percentage of total assets, 58. 3 percent of cash and cash equivalents, up drastically from 17. percent in 2005, while Amazon had cash and cash equivalents of one-third (33. 3 percent) of total sales, up slightly from 27. 4 percent in 2005. Amazon’s total current assets were 74 percent of total assets, whereas Overstock had total current assets that totaled 84. 7 percent of total assets, which increased from 72. 1 percent of total assets in 2005. Since current assets were a large percentage of total assets, the reverse would be expected, and total current liabilities for an online retailer would also be a significant portion of total liabilities and stockholders’ equity. Most consumers mak e purchases online using credit cards and those purchases are often paid off within a year, making them current.Total current liabilities for Amazon in 2008 were 57 percent of total assets, remaining stable year over year between 2008 and 2005, while total current liabilities for Overstock were 61. 6 percent of total assets, up from 47. 5 percent in 2005. Corporate Governance Overstock has a board of directors that is comprised of four members, three of whom are independent, and is chaired by the CEO Patrick Byrne. According to the proxy statement (DEF 14A) filed on April 2, 2009, the board of directors held ten meeting during 2008 and each director attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of the board (2009, p. 14). Overstock has an audit committee and compensation committee, but no standing nominations committee.According to the proxy statement, the audit committee held 11 meetings during 2008 and the compensation committee held six meetings, and like board meetings each direc tor attended at least 75 percent of the committee meetings on which he or she served in 2008 (2009, p. 14). The audit committee is chaired by Allison Abraham and includes two financial experts, as defined by the SEC. The audit committee is responsible for â€Å"reviewing and monitoring our financial statements and internal accounting procedures, selecting, reviewing and monitoring our independent registered public accounting firm, evaluating the scope of the annual audit, reviewing audit results and consulting with management and our independent registered public accounting firm prior to presentation of financial statements to stockholders† (2009, p. 15).The compensation committee is responsible for â€Å"determining salaries, incentives and other forms of compensation for our directors, officers and other employees and administering various incentive compensation and benefit plans† (2009, p. 15). The 208 proxy statement says the compensation objectives are to â€Å"s eek to attract and retain highly competent executive management who will build long-term economic value for the Company† and that â€Å"our compensation philosophy is that the executive salary and bonus levels should be modest in comparison to those paid at comparable companies, and that executives’ opportunities for more significant compensation should be tied closely to the Company’s performance (2009, p. 20).The elements of total compensation, as laid out by the 2009 proxy statement include â€Å"base salary, annual individual cash bonuses, payments under our Performance Share Plan, awards under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, matching contributions under our 401 (k) plan and benefits under our health and welfare benefits plans† (2009, p. 20-21). The board of directors for Amazon consists of nine members, eight of whom are independent, and is chaired by the CEO of Amazon, Jeffrey Bezos. The 2009 proxy statement reads that the board is responsible for à ¢â‚¬Å"the control and direction of the Company† and â€Å"represents the Company’s shareholders and its primary purpose is to build long-term shareholder value† (2009, p. 8). In 2008, the board of directors met nine times and that all directors attended at least 75 percent of the â€Å"aggregate of the meetings of the board and committees occurring while they were members† (2009, p. 9).Amazon has an audit committee, leadership development and compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The audit committee is chaired by Tom Alberg, who meets the requirement of a financial expert as defined by the SEC. According to the 2009 proxy statement, the audit committee â€Å"represents and assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to the Company’s financial statements and reporting process, the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounti ng firm, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements† (2009, p. 9).The leadership development and compensation committee, as stated in the 2009 proxy statement, â€Å"evaluates the Company’s programs and practices relating to leadership development, reviews and establishes compensation of the Company’s executive officers, and administers the Company’s stock-based and certain other compensation plans, all with a view toward maximizing long-term shareholder value† (2009, p. 10). The proxy statement for 2009, also lays out the responsibilities of the nominating and corporate governance committee, and says it â€Å"reviews and assesses the composition of the board, assists in identifying potential new candidates for director, recommends candidates for election as director and provides a leadership role with respect to corporate governance of the Company† (2009, p. 10).According to the 2009 proxy statement, Amazon’s executive compensation approach is â€Å"to tie total compensation to long-term shareholder value, as reflected primarily in the Company’s stock price† and therefore the â€Å"primary component of a named executive officer’s total compensation is stock-based compensation† (2009, p. 17). In addition to stock-based compensation, executives also receive a base salary, new-hire cash bonuses and other compensation and benefits, including vacation, medical, 401 (k) and relocation benefits. Conclusion When it comes to online retailing, Amazon is far and away the leader of the industry and the model for all companies to follow. Amazon has an enormous share of the market and their market capitalization is tremendous. Their financial ratios are sound and their year over year statistics are rather impressive. Overstock, on the other hand, is a company that leaves a lot to be desired.They have had numerous restatements of their financial reports, and two instances of these restatements have been covered in detail above. Overstock has yet to have a positive net income and has had net losses every year. Due to the sheer amount of restatements that have occurred, many executives have fired or resigned their positions and taken the fall for their accounting errors and subsequent SEC investigations. Overstock seems to need to branch out into different revenue streams, such as car and real estate listings, insurance quotes and travel services in order to differentiate themselves from Amazon and capture some market share back from the titan of the industry.Amazon has its eyes on bigger targets, and wants to stand toe to toe with another gigantic company, Apple. Amazon’s manufacturing and subsequent sales of the various incarnations of the Kindle and an online music service are bold ideas that have paid off handsomely for the company, as have their investments in supply chain and shipping processes, as well as third party relationships. Overstock, for its part, would most likely just like a piece of Amazon’s market share and still has a long way to go before it is anywhere near the level of an Amazon. Overstock first needs to get its accounting controls in order and make sure that the financial statements they release in their annual reports to the SEC will not be restated in the future.The audit committee, auditors, CFO and accountants need to work together to ensure that their work is free from error, and there clearly needs to be a change in the corporate culture at Overstock because change needs to come from the top. These accounting errors should have been caught before the statements were released and given their history of investigations by the SEC, Overstock should have made every effort to clean up its act and bring in competent accounting and auditing professionals that would have the requisite attention to detail required in producing mistake free financial reports. If Overstock has any hope of ever reaching the level of an Amazon, it needs to fix its accounting issues and to install investor confidence in the company.Outside of their ROA, ROE, and ROI ratios, which are negative due to their net losses, Overstock’s financial ratios stack up nicely against the financial ratios of Amazon, which are a good sign for the company moving forward, if they can right the ship. The fact that Overstock is still around today has to be a good sign for the company, in that is has come through adversity and still remains a going concern. References Amazon, Inc. (2009). 2008 Annual Report. Seattle, WA: Amazon, Inc. , 2009. Amazon, Inc. (2008). 2007 Annual Report. Seattle, WA: Amazon, Inc. , 2008. Amazon, Inc. (2007). 2006 Annual Report. Seattle, WA: Amazon, Inc. , 2007. Amazon, Inc. (2006). 2005 Annual Report. Seattle, WA: Amazon, Inc. , 2006. Amazon, Inc. (2009) Definitive Proxy Statements.Seattle, WA: Amazon, Inc. 2009. Amazon, Inc. (2008) Definitive Proxy Statements. Seattle, WA: Amazon, Inc. 2008. Antar, S. (2010, October 16). Does Overstock. com CEO Patrick Byrne know when to shut up, especially while the SEC investigates his company? Retrieved October 30, 2011, from Phil’s Stock World Web site: http:// www. philstockworld. com Boyd, R. (2007, May 11). Company Byrne-d on probe report. New York Post, pp39. Cheng, A. (2006, May 11). Overstock cancels its share sale after SEC subpoena. Deseret News, pp. E4. Harvey, T. (2010, February 5). Overstock hit by another restatement. The Salt Lake Tribune. Hendrick, D. (2009, November 18).Online retailer fires auditor over accounting fight. SNL Kagan Media & Communications Report. Kanaracus, C. (2008, November 3). Overstock’s ERP woes force it to restate results. Computerworld, 42(44), pp. 7. Keahey, J. (2009, September 23). Overstock CEO and his critics differ over SEC probe. The Salt Lake Tribune. Kessler, S. (2011, October 13). Industry sur veys computers: consumer services & the internet. Standard & Poor’s. Mergent, Inc. (2011). Mergent Online. Mims, B. (2006, March 1). Overstock to restate earnings. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, pp. 1. Moving the market: Overstock. com corrects results back to 2002; losses are narrowed. (2006, March 1).Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition), pp. 1. Overstock. com, Inc. (2009) 2008 Amended Annual Report. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2009. Overstock. com, Inc. (2008) 2007 Amended Annual Report. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2008. Overstock. com, Inc. (2007) 2006 Amended Annual Report. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2007. Overstock. com, Inc. (2006) 2005 Amended Annual Report. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2006. Overstock. com, Inc. (2009) 2008 Annual Report. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2009. Overstock. com, Inc. (2008) 2007 Annual Report. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2008.Overstock . com, Inc. (2007) 2006 Annual Report. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2007. Overstock. com, Inc. (2006) 2005 Annual Report. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2006. Overstock. com announces receipt of another SEC subpoena. (2009, September 17). PR Newswire. Overstock. com – President interview. (2006, March 1). CEO Wire. Overstock corrects its financial results. (2006, March 1). Deseret News, pp. E1. Overstock. com, Inc. (2009). Definitive proxy statement. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2009. Overstock. com, Inc. (2008). Definitive proxy statement. Salt Lake City, Utah: Overstock. com, Inc. , 2008.Overstock gets SEC subpoena. (2006, May 10). Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition). Overstock. com shifting income. (2010, February 6). Deseret News, pp. A10. Q3 2008 Overstock Com Inc earnings conference call – final. (2008, October 24). Fair Disclosure Wire. SEC closes Overstock. com probe, will take no action. (2008, June 7). Financial Wire. Standard & Poor’s. (2011) Standard & Poor’s NetAdvantage. Taub, S. (2006, February 28). Freight costs spur Overstock restatement. CFO. com, pp. 1. Appendices Overstock Original Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands)| | | | Year Ended December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Revenue| | | | |Direct Revenue| 174,203| 195,622| 303,202| 324,875| Fulfillment partner revenue| 660,164| 564,539| 484,948| 478,947| Total Revenue| 834,367| 760,161| 788,150| 803,822| | | | | | Cost of goods sold:| | | | | Direct| 154,501| 164,368| 284,943| 283,377| Fulfillment partner| 536,957| 468,222| 408,407| 400,889| Total cost of goods sold| 691,458| 632,590| 693,350| 683,266| Gross profit| 142,909| 127,571| 94,800| 120,556| | | | | | Operating expenses:| | | | | Sales and Marketing| 57,634| 55,458| 70,897| 79,651| Technology| 57,815| 59,453| 65,158| 28,132| General and administrative| 38,373| 41,976| 46,837| 36,495| Restructuring| —| 12,283| 5,674| —|Amortiza tion of stock-based compensation| —| —| —| 72| Total operating expenses| 153,822| 169,170| 188,566| 144,350| | | | | | Operating loss| (10,913)| (41,599)| (93,766)| (23,794)| Interest income, net| 3,163| 4,788| 3,566| (270)| Interest expense| (3,462)| (4,188)| (4,765)| (5,582)| Other income (expense), net| (1,446)| (92)| 81| 4,728| | | | | | Loss from continuing operations| (12,658)| (41,091)| (94,884)| —| Loss from discontinued operations| —| (3,924)| (6,882)| —| | | | | | Net loss| (12,658)| (45,015)| (101,856)| (24,918)| | | | Overstock Restated Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands)| | | | For Year Ended December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Revenue| | | | | Direct Revenue| 174,203| 197,088| 301,509| 324,875|Fulfillment partner revenue| 660,164| 568,814| 478,628| 474,441| Total Revenue| 834,367| 765,902| 780,137| 799,316| | | | | | Cost of goods sold| | | | | Direct| 154,501| 168,008| 284,774| 282,383| Fulfillment partner | 536,957| 473,344| 405,559| 400,057| Total cost of goods sold| 691,458| 641,352| 690,333| 682,440| Gross profit| 142,909| 124,550| 89,804| 116,876| | | | | | Operating expenses:| | | | | Sales and Marketing| 57,634| 57,815| 38,373| 77,155| Technology| 57,815| 59,453| 70,897| 27,901| General and administrative| 38,373| 41,976| 46,837| 33,043| Restructuring| —| 12,283| 5,674| —| Amortization of stock-based compensation| —| —| —| —| Total operating expenses| 153,822| 169,170| 188,566| 138,099| | | | | |Operating loss| (10,913)| (44,620)| (98,762)| (21,223)| Interest income, net| 3,163| 4,788| 3,566| (270)| Interest expense| (3,462)| (4,188)| (4,765)| (5,582)| Other income (expense), net| (1,446)| (92)| 81| 4,728| | | | | | Loss from continuing operations| (12,658)| (44,112)| (99,880)| (22,347)| Loss from discontinued operations| —| (3,924)| (6,882)| (2,571)| | | | | | Net loss| (12,658)| (48,036)| (106,762)| (24,918)| Overstock Common-S ize Consolidated Statements of Operations| | | | | | | Year Ended December, 31| (% of revenue)| 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Total Revenue| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| Total cost of goods sold| 82. 9%| 83. 2%| 88%| 85%| Gross profit| 17. 1%| 16. 7%| 12%| 15%| Operating expenses:| | | | |Sales and Marketing| 6. 9%| 7. 3%| 9%| 9. 9%| Technology| 6. 9%| 7. 8%| 8. 3%| 3. 5%| General and administrative| 4. 6%| 5. 5%| 6%| 4. 5%| Restructuring| —| 1. 6%| . 7%| —| Amortization of stock-based compensation| —| —| —| . 009%| Total operating expenses| 18. 4%| 22. 3%| 23. 9%| 18%| | | | | | Operating loss| -1. 3%| -5. 5%| -11. 9%| -3%| Interest income, net| . 3%| . 6%| . 5%| -. 03%| Interest expense| -. 4%| -. 6%| -. 6%| -. 7%| Other income (expense), net| -. 1%| -. 01%| . 01%| . 6%| | | | | | Loss from continuing operations| -1. 5%| -5. 4%| -12%| —| Loss from discontinued operations| —| -. 5%| -. 9%| —| | | | | | Net loss| -1. %| -5. 9%| -12. 9%| - 3. 1%| | | | | | Overstock Trend Consolidated Statements of Operations (2005= 100%)| | | | | | | For Year Ended December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Total Revenue| 103. 8%| 94. 6%| 98. 1%| 100%| Total cost of goods sold| 101. 2%| 92. 6%| 101. 5%| 100%| Gross profit| 118. 5%| 105. 8%| 78. 7%| 100%| Operating expenses:| | | | | Sales and Marketing| 72. 4%| 69. 7%| 89%| 100%| Technology| 205. 6%| 211. 3%| 231. 6%| 100%| General and administrative| 105. 1%| 115%| 128. 3%| 100%| Total operating expenses| 106. 6%| 117. 2%| 130. 6%| 100%| | | | | | Operating loss| 45. 9%| 174. 8%| 394. 1%| 100%| Interest expense| 62%| 75%| 85. %| 100%| | | | | | Loss from continuing operations| 13. 3%| 43. 3%| 100%| —| Loss from discontinued operations| —| 57%| 100%| —| | | | | | Net loss| 50. 8%| 180. 7%| 408. 8%| 100%| Overstock Restated Common-Size Consolidated Statements of Operations| | | | | | | For Year Ended December 31,| (% of revenue)| 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Total Revenue | 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| Total cost of goods sold| 82. 9%| 83. 7%| 88. 5%| 85. 4%| Gross profit| 17. 1%| 16. 3%| 11. 5%| 14. 6%| Operating expenses:| | | | | Sales and Marketing| 6. 9%| 7. 5%| 4. 9%| 9. 7%| Technology| 6. 9%| 7. 8%| 9. 1%| 3. 5%| General and administrative| 4. 6%| 5. 5%| 6%| 4. 1%|Restructuring| —| 1. 6%| . 7%| —| Amortization of stock-based compensation| —| —| —| —-| Total operating expenses| 18. 4%| 22. 1%| 24. 2%| 17. 3%| | | | | | Operating loss| -1. 3%| -5. 8%| -12. 7%| -2. 7%| Interest income, net| . 4%| . 6%| . 5%| -. 03%| Interest expense| -. 4%| . 5%| -. 6%| -. 7%| Other income (expense), net| -. 2%| . 01%| . 01%| . 6%| | | | | | Loss from continuing operations| -1. 5%| -5. 8%| -12. 8%| -2. 8%| Loss from discontinued operations| —| -. 5%| -. 9%| -. 3%| | | | | | Net loss| -1. 5%| -6. 3%| -13. 7%| -3. 1%| | | | | | Overstock Trend Restated Consolidated Statements of Operations (2005= 100%)| | | | | | For Year Ended December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Total Revenue| 104. 4%| 95. 8%| 97. 6%| 100%| Total cost of goods sold| 101. 3%| 94%| 101. 2%| 100%| Gross profit| 122. 3%| 106. 6%| 76. 8%| 100%| Operating expenses:| | | | | Sales and Marketing| 74. 7%| 75%| 50%| 100%| Technology| 207. 2%| 213. 1%| 254. 1%| 100%| General and administrative| 116. 1%| 127%| 141. 7%| 100%| Total operating expenses| 111. 3%| 122. 5%| 136. 5%| 100%| | | | | | Operating loss| 51. 4%| 210. 2%| 465. 4%| 100%| Interest expense| 62%| 75%| 85. 4%| 100%| | | | | | Loss from continuing operations| 56. 6%| 197. 4%| 447%| 100%| Loss from discontinued operations| —| 152. 6%| 267. %| 100%| | | | | | Net loss| 50. 8%| 192. 9%| 428. 5%| 100%| Overstock Original Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands)| | | | December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| | Assets| Current Assets:| | | | | Cash and cash equivalents| 100,577| 101,394| 126,965| 56,224| Marketable securities| 8,959| 46,000| —| 55,799| Cash, cash eq uivalents and marketable securities| 109,566| 147,394| 126,965| 112,023| Accounts receivable, net| 6,985| 12,304| 11,638| 11,695| Notes receivable| 1,250| 1,506| 6,702| —| Inventories, net| 17,723| 25,933| 20,274| 93,269| Prepaid inventory, net| 761| 3,572| 2,241| 9,633| Prepaid expense| 9,694| 7,572| 7,473| 8,508|Current assets of held for sale subsidiary| | | 4,718| | Total current assets| 145,975| 198,281| 180,011| 235,128| Restricted cash| —| —| —| 253| Fixed assets, net| 23,142| 27,197| 56,198| 61,914| Goodwill| 2,784| 2,784| 2,784| 13,169| Other long-term assets, net| 538| 86| 578| 15,449| Notes receivable| —| 4,181| —| —| Long-term assets of held for sale subsidiary| | | 16,594| | Total assets| 172,441| 235,529| 265,165| 325,913| | | | | | Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)| Current liabilities:| | | | | Accounts payable| 62,120| 70,648| 66,039| 101,436| Accrued liabilities| 25,154| 52,598| 40,142| 46,847| De ferred Revenue| 19,026| —| —| —| Capital lease obligations| —| 3,796| 5,074| 6,683|Current liabilities of held for sale subsidiary| | | 3,684| | Total current liabilities| 106,300| 127,042| 114,939| 154,966| Other long-term liabilities| 2,572| 3,034| —| —| Capital lease obligations, non-current| —-| —-| 3,983| 3,058| Convertible senior notes| 66,558| 75,623| 75,279| 74,935| Total liabilities| 175,430| 205,699| 194,201| 232,959| | | | | | Stockholders’ equity (deficit):| | | | | Preferred stock| —| —| —| —| Common stock| 2| 2| 2| 2| Additional paid in capital| 338,620| 333,909| 325,771| 251,244| Accumulated deficit| (264,985)| (243,709)| (198,694)| (96,829)| Unearned stock-based compensation| | | | (305)|Treasury stock| (76,670)| (63,278)| (64,983)| (65,325)| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)| 48| (94)| (132)| 962| Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)| (2,985)| 26,830| 61,964 | 89,749| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)| 172,445| 232,529| 265,165| 325,913| | | | | | Overstock Restated Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands)| | | | December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| | Assets| Current Assets:| | | | | Cash and cash equivalents| 100,577| 101,394| 126,965| 55,875| Marketable securities| 8,989| 46,000| —| 55,799| Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities| 109,566| 147,394| 126,965| 111,674| Accounts receivable, net| 6,985| 11,208| 16,330| 10,021| Notes receivable| 1,250| 1,506| 6,702| —|Inventories, net| 17,723| 25,643| 23,970| 93,269| Prepaid inventory, net| 761| 3,572| 2,241| 9,633| Prepaid expense| 9,694| 7,572| 7,473| 8,477| Current assets of held for sale subsidiary| | | 4,718| 2,054| Total current assets| 145,979| 196,895| 188,299| 235,128| Restricted cash| | | | 253| Fixed assets, net| 23,144| 27,197| 56,198| 60,850| Goodwill| 2,784| 2,784| 2,784| 2,784| Other long-term assets, net| 538| 86| 578| 3, 333| Notes receivable| —| 4,181| —| —| Long-term assets of held for sale subsidiary| | | 16,594| 23,565| Total assets| 172,445| 231,143| 264,453| 325,913| | | | | | Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)| Current liabilities:| | | | |Accounts payable| 62,120| 70,358| 58,412| 100,188| Accrued liabilities| 25,154| 37,155| 38,434| 45,934| Deferred Revenue| 19,026| 22,965| 23,220| 6,683| Capital lease obligations| —| 3,796| 5,074| —| Current liabilities of held for sale subsidiary| | | 3,684| 2,161| Total current liabilities| 106,300| 134,274| 128,824| 154,966| Other long-term liabilities| 2,572| 3,034| —| —| Capital lease obligations, non-current| —| —| 3,983| 3,058| Convertible senior notes| 66,558| 75,623| 75,279| 74,935| Total liabilities| 175,430| 212,931| 208,086| 232,959| | | | | | Stockholders’ equity (deficit):| | | | | Preferred stock| —| —| —| —| Common stock| 2| 2 | 2| 2|Additional paid in capital| 338,620| 333,909| 325,771| 250,939| Accumulated deficit| (264,985)| (252,327)| (204,291)| (96,829)| Treasury stock| (76,670)| (63,278)| (64,983)| (65,325)| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)| 48| (94)| (132)| 962| Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)| (2,985)| 18,212| 56,367| 89,749| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)| 172,445| 231,143| 264,453| 325,913| Overstock Restated Common-Size Consolidated Balance Sheets| | | | | | | December 31,| (% of total assets)| 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Assets| | | | | Current Assets:| | | | | Cash and cash equivalents| 58. 3%| 43. 9%| 48%| 17. 1%| Marketable securities| 5. 2%| 19. 9%| —| 17. 1%| Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities| 63. 5%| 63. 8%| 48%| 34. 2%| Accounts receivable, net| 4. 1%| . 5%| 6. %| 3. 1%| Notes receivable| . 7%| . 7%| 2. 5%| —| Inventories, net| 10. 3%| 11. 1%| 9. 1%| 28. 6%| Prepaid inventory, net| . 4%| 1. 5%| . 8%| 3%| Prep aid expense| 5. 6%| 3. 3%| 2. 8%| 2. 6%| Current assets of held for sale subsidiary| | | 1. 8%| . 6%| Total current assets| 84. 7%| 85. 2%| 71. 2%| 72. 1%| Restricted cash| | | | . 07%| Fixed assets, net| 13. 4%| 11. 8%| 21. 3%| 18. 7%| Goodwill| 1. 6%| 1. 2%| 1. 1%| . 9%| Other long-term assets, net| . 3%| . 04%| . 2%| 1%| Notes receivable| —| 1. 8%| —| —| Long-term assets of held for sale subsidiary| | | 6. 3%| 7. 2%| Total assets| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| | | | | | Liabilities| | | | |Current liabilities:| | | | | Accounts payable| 36%| 30. 4%| 22. 1%| 30. 7%| Accrued liabilities| 14. 6%| 16. 1%| 14. 5%| 14. 1%| Deferred Revenue| 11%| 10%| 8. 8%| 2. 1%| Capital lease obligations| —| 1. 6%| 1. 9%| —| Current liabilities of held for sale subsidiary| | | 1. 4%| . 7%| Total current liabilities| 61. 6%| 58. 1%| 48. 7%| 47. 5%| Other long-term liabilities| 1. 5%| 1. 3%| —| —| Capital lease obligations, non-current| —| —| 1. 5%| . 9%| Convertible senior notes| 38. 6%| 32. 7%| 28. 5%| 23%| Total liabilities| 101. 7%| 92. 1%| 78. 7%| 71. 5%| | | | | | Stockholders’ Equity| | | | | Stockholders’ equity (deficit):| | | | |Preferred stock| —| —| —| —| Common stock| —| —| —| —| Additional paid in capital| 196. 4%| 144. 5%| 123. 2%| 77%| Accumulated deficit| -153. 7%| -109. 2%| -77. 3%| -29. 7%| Treasury stock| -44. 5%| -27. 4%| -24. 6%| -20%| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)| . 03%| -. 04%| -. 05%| . 3%| Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)| -1. 7%| 7. 9%| 21. 3%| 27. 5%| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| Overstock Restated Trend Consolidated Balance Sheets (2005 = 100%)| | | | | | | December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Assets| | | | | Current Assets:| | | | | Cash and cash equivalents| 180%| 181. 5%| 227. %| 100%| Marketable securities| 16. 1%| 82. 4%| —| 100% | Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities| 98. 1%| 132%| 113. 7%| 100%| Accounts receivable, net| 69. 7%| 111. 8%| 163%| 100%| Notes receivable| 18. 7%| 22. 5%| 100%| | Inventories, net| 19%| 27. 5%| 25. 7%| 100%| Prepaid inventory, net| 7. 9%| 37. 1%| 23. 3%| 100%| Prepaid expense| 114. 4%| 89. 3%| 88. 2%| 100%| Current assets of held for sale subsidiary| —| —| 229. 7%| 100%| Total current assets| 62. 1%| 83. 7%| 80. 1%| 100%| Restricted cash| —| —| —| 100%| Fixed assets, net| 38%| 44. 7%| 92. 4%| 100%| Goodwill| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| Other long-term assets, net| 16. 1%| 2. %| 17. 3%| 100%| Notes receivable| —| 100%| —| —| Long-term assets of held for sale subsidiary| | | 70. 4%| 100%| Total assets| 53%| 71%| 81. 1%| 100%| | | | | | Liabilities| | | | | Current liabilities:| | | | | Accounts payable| 62%| 70. 2%| 58. 3%| 100%| Accrued liabilities| 54. 8%| 80. 9%| 83. 7%| 100%| Deferred Revenue| 284. 7%| 343. 6%| 347 . 4%| 100%| Capital lease obligations| —| 74. 8%| 100%| 00%| Current liabilities of held for sale subsidiary| | | 170. 5%| 100%| Total current liabilities| 68. 6%| 86. 6%| 83. 1%| 100%| Other long-term liabilities| 84. 8%| 100%| —| —00%| Capital lease obligations, non-current| —| —| 130. %| 100%| Convertible senior notes| 88. 8%| 101%| 100. 5%| 100%| Total liabilities| 75. 3%| 91. 4%| 89. 3%| 100%| | | | | | Stockholders’ Equity| | | | | Stockholders’ equity (deficit):| | | | | Preferred stock| —| —| —| —00%| Common stock| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| Additional paid in capital| 134. 9%| 133. 1%| 129. 8%| 100%| Accumulated deficit| 273. 7%| 260. 6%| 211%| 100%| Treasury stock| 117. 4%| 96. 9%| 99. 5%| 100%| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)| 5%| -9. 8%| -13. 7%| 100%| Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)| -3. 3%| 20. 3%| 62. 8| 100%| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)| 52. 9%| 70. 9%| 81. 1%| 100%|Amazon Consolidated Statements of Operations (in millions)| | | | Year Ended December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Net sales| 19,166| 14,835| 10,711| 8,490| Cost of sales| 14,896| 11,482| 8,255| 6,451| Gross profit| 4,270| 3,353| 2,456| 2,039| Operating expenses:| | | | | Fulfillment| 1,658| 1,292| 937| 745| Marketing| 482| 344| 263| 198| Technology and content| 1,033| 818| 662| 451| General and administrative| 279| 235| 195| 166| Other operating expense (income), net| (24)| 9| 10| 47| Total operating expenses| 3,428| 2,698| 2,067| 1,607| Income from operations| 842| 655| 389| 432| Interest income| 83| 90| 59| 44| Interest expense| (71)| (77)| (78)| (92)| Other income (expense), net| 47| (8)| 7| 2|Total non-operating income (expense)| 59| 5| 12| 42| Income before income taxes| 901| 660| 377| 428| Provision for income taxes| (247)| (184)| (187)| 95| Equity-method investment activity, net of tax| (9)| —| —| —| Income before cumulati ve effect of change in accounting principle| | | | 333| Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle| | | | 26| Net income| 645| 476| 190| 359| Amazon Common-Size Consolidated Statements of Operations| | | | | | | Year Ended December 31,| (% of sales)| 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Net sales| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| Cost of sales| 77. 7%| 77. 4%| 77. 1%| 76%| Gross profit| 22. 3%| 22. 6%| 22. 9%| 24%| Operating expenses:| | | | |Fulfillment| 8. 7%| 8. 7%| 8. 7%| 8. 8%| Marketing| 2. 5%| 2. 3%| 2. 5%| 2. 3%| Technology and content| 5. 4%| 5. 5%| 6. 2%| 5. 3%| General and administrative| 1. 5%| 1. 6%| 1. 8%| 2%| Other operating expense (income), net| -. 1%| . 06%| . 09%| . 6%| Total operating expenses| 17. 9%| 18. 2%| 19. 3%| 18. 9%| Income from operations| 4. 4%| 4. 4%| 3. 6%| 5. 1%| Interest income| . 4%| . 6%| . 6%| . 5%| Interest expense| -. 4%| -. 5%| -. 7%| -1. 1%| Other income (expense), net| . 2%| -. 05%| . 07%| . 02%| Total non-operating income (expense)| . 3%| . 03%| . 1%| . 5%| Income before income taxes| 4. 7%| 4. 4%| 3. 5%| 5%| Provision for income taxes| -1. 3%| -1. %| -1. 7%| 1. 1%| Equity-method investment activity, net of tax| -. 05%| —| —| —| Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle| | | | 3. 9%| Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle| | | | . 3%| Net income| 3. 4%| 3. 2%| 1. 8%| 4. 2%| | | | | | | Amazon Trend Consolidated Statements of Operations (2005 = 100%)| | | | | | | For Year Ended December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Net sales| 225. 7%| 174. 7%| 126. 2%| 100%| Cost of sales| 231%| 178%| 1278%| 100%| Gross profit| 209. 4%| 164. 4%| 120. 5%| 100%| Operating expenses:| | | | | Fulfillment| 222. 6%| 173. 4%| 125. 8%| 100%| Marketing| 243. 4%| 173. %| 132. 8%| 100%| Technology and content| 229%| 181. 4%| 146. 8%| 100%| General and administrative| 168. 1%| 141. 6%| 117. 5%| 100%| Other operating expense (income), net| -51. 1%| 19. 1%| 21. 3%| 100%| Total operating expenses| 213. 3%| 167. 9%| 128. 6%| 100%| Income from operations| 194. 9%| 151. 6%| 90%| 100%| Interest income| 180. 6%| 204. 5%| 134. 1%| 100%| Interest expense| 77. 2%| 83. 7%| 84. 8%| 100%| Other income (expense), net| 2350%| -400%| 350%| 100%| Total non-operating income (expense)| 140. 5%| 11. 9%| 28. 6%| 100%| Income before income taxes| 210. 5%| 154. 2%| 88. 1%| 100%| Provision for income taxes| -260%| -193. 7%| -196. %| 100%| Equity-method investment activity, net of tax| 100%| —| —| —| Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle| | | | 100%| Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle| | | | 100%| Net income| 179. 7%| 132. 6%| 52. 9%| 100%| Amazon Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions)| | | | December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| | Assets| Current assets:| | | | | Cash and cash equivalents| 2,769| 2,539| 1,022| 1,013| Marketable securities| 958| 573| 997| 987| Inventories| 1,399| 1,200| 877| 566| Accounts receivable, net and other| 8 27| 705| 399| 274| Deferred tax assets| 204| 147| 78| 89| Total current assets| 6,157| 5,164| 3,373| 2,929| Fixed assets, net| 854| 543| 457| 348| Deferred tax assets| 145| 260| 199| 223|Goodwill| 438| 222| 195| 159| Other assets| 720| 296| 139| 37| Total assets| 8,324| 6,485| 4,363| 3,696| | Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity| Current liabilities:| | | | | Accounts payable| 3,594| 2,795| 1,816| 1,366| Accrued expenses and other| 1,093| 902| 716| 533| Current portion of long-term debt| 59| 17| —| —| Total current liabilities| 4,746| 3,714| 2,532| 1,899| Long-term debt| 409| 1,282| 1,247| 1,480| Other long-term liabilities| 487| 292| 153| 71| Commitments and contingencies| | | | | Stockholders’ equity:| | | | | Preferred stock| —| —| —| —| Common stock| 4| 4| 4| 4| Treasury stock, at cost| (600)| (500)| (252)| —|Additional paid-in capital| 4,121| 3,063| 2,517| 2,263| Accumulate other comprehensive income (loss)| (123)| 5| (1)| 6| Accumulated deficit| (730)| (1,375)| (1,837)| (2,027)| Total stockholders’ equity| 2,672| 1,197| 431| 246| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity| 8,314| 6,485| 4,363| 3,696| Amazon Common-Size Consolidated Balance Sheets| | | | | | | December 31,| (% of total assets)| 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Assets| | | | | Current assets:| | | | | Cash and cash equivalents| 33. 3%| 39. 2%| 23. 4%| 27. 4%| Marketable securities| 11. 6%| 8. 8%| 22. 9%| 26. 7%| Inventories| 16. 8%| 18. 5%| 20. 1%| 15. 3%| Accounts receivable, net and other| 9. 9%| 10. 9%| 9. 1%| 7. 4%| Deferred tax assets| 2. 5%| 2. 3%| 1. 8%| 2. 4%|Total current assets| 74%| 79. 6%| 77. 3%| 79. 2%| Fixed assets, net| 10. 3%| 8. 4%| 10. 5%| 9. 4%| Deferred tax assets| 1. 7%| 4%| 4. 6%| 6%| Goodwill| 5. 3%| 3. 4%| 4. 5%| 4. 3%| Other assets| 8. 6%| 4. 6%| 3. 2%| 1%| Total assets| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| | | | | | Liabilities| | | | | Current liabilities:| | | | | Accounts payable| 43. 2%| 43. 1%| 41. 6%| 3 7%| Accrued expenses and other| 13. 1%| 13. 9%| 16. 4%| 14. 4%| Current portion of long-term debt| . 7%| . 3%| —| —| Total current liabilities| 57%| 57. 3%| 58%| 51. 4%| Long-term debt| 4. 9%| 19. 8%| 28. 6%| 40%| Other long-term liabilities| 5. 9%| 4. 5%| 3. 5%| 1. 9%| | | | | | Stockholders’ Equity| | | | |Preferred stock| —| —| —| —| Common stock| . 05%| . 06%| . 09%| . 1%| Treasury stock, at cost| -7. 2%| -7. 7%| -5. 8%| —| Additional paid-in capital| 49. 5%| 47. 2%| 57. 7%| 61. 2%| Accumulate other comprehensive income (loss)| -1. 5%| . 08%| -. 02%| . 2%| Accumulated deficit| -8. 8%| -21. 2%| -42. 1%| -54. 8%| Total stockholders’ equity| 32. 1%| 18. 5%| 9. 9%| 6. 7%| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| | | | | | Amazon Trend Consolidated Balance Sheets (2005 = 100%)| | | | | | | December 31,| | 2008| 2007| 2006| 2005| Assets| | | | | Current assets:| | | | | Cash and cash equiv alents| 273. 3%| 250. 6%| 100. %| 100%| Marketable securities| 97. 1%| 58. 1%| 101%| 100%| Inventories| 247. 2%| 212%| 155%| 100%| Accounts receivable, net and other| 301. 8%| 257. 3%| 145. 6%| 100%| Deferred tax assets| 229. 2%| 165. 2%| 87. 6%| 100%| Total current assets| 210. 2%| 176. 3%| 115. 2%| 100%| Fixed assets, net| 245. 4%| 156%| 131. 3%| 100%| Deferred tax assets| 65%| 116. 6%| 89. 2%| 100%| Goodwill| 275. 5%| 139. 6%| 122. 6%| 100%| Other assets| 1945. 9%| 800%| 375. 7%| 100%| Total assets| 225. 2%| 175. 5%| 118%| 100%| | | | | | Liabilities| | | | | Current liabilities:| | | | | Accounts payable| 263. 1%| 204. 6%| 132. 9%| 100%| Accrued expenses and other| 205. 1%| 169. %| 134. 3%| 100%| Current portion of long-term debt| 347. 1%| 100%| —| —| Total current liabilities| 249. 9%| 195. 6%| 133. 3%| 100%| Long-term debt| 27. 6%| 86. 6%| 84. 3%| 100%| Other long-term liabilities| 685. 9%| 411. 3%| 215. 5%| 100%| | | | | | Stockholders’ Equity| | | | | Pr eferred stock| —| —| —| —| Common stock| 100%| 100%| 100%| 100%| Treasury stock, at cost| 240%| 200%| 100%| —| Additional paid-in capital| 182. 1%| 135. 4%| 111. 2%| 100%| Accumulate other comprehensive income (loss)| -2050%| 83. 3%| -16. 7%| 100%| Accumulated deficit| 36%| 67. 8%| 90. 1%| 100%| Total stockholders’ equity| 1086. 2%| 486. 6%| 175. %| 100%| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity| 224. 9%| 175. 5%| 118%| 100%| Overstock Financial Ratios| | | | | | 2008| 2007| 2006| Return on assets (net)(ROA)| -6. 23%| -18. 09%| -34. 43%| Return on equity (net) (ROE)| -105. 88%| -101. 39%| -131. 38%| Return on income (Operating) (ROI)| -12. 82%| -32. 94%| -57. 89%| EBITDA Margin| 1. 24| -1. 6| -7. 8| Calculated tax rate| —| —| —| Revenue per employee| $803,173| $900,665| $912,211| Quick ratio| 1. 04| 1. 21| 1. 2| Current ratio| 1. 37| 1. 56| 1. 57| Net current assets| 23. 01%| 30. 64%| 24. 54%| Long-term debt to equity| —| 2. 82| 1. 28| Total debt to equity| —| 2. 96| 1. 36|Interest coverage| —| —| —| Total asset turnover| 4. 11x| 3. 05x| 2. 67x| Receivables turnover| 75. 49x| 47. 29x| 52. 48x| Inventory turnover| 31. 68x| 27. 38x| 12. 21x| Accounts payable turnover| 12. 53x| 11. 12x| 9. 41x| Accrued expenses turnover| 27. 55x| 20. 9x| 19. 13x| Property, plant and equipment turnover| 33. 06x| 18. 23x| 13. 35x| Cash and cash equivalents turnover| 6. 48x| 5. 54x| 6. 6x| | | | | Amazon Financial Ratios| | | | | | 2008| 2007| 2006| Return on assets (net)(ROA)| 8. 69%| 8. 78%| 4. 72%| Return on equity (net) (ROE)| 33. 25%| 58. 48%| 56. 13%| Return on income (Operating) (ROI)| 28. 93%| 30. 9%| 22. 45%| EBITDA Margin| 6. 26%| 6. 1%| 5. 56%|Calculated tax rate| 27. 41%| 27. 88%| 49. 6%| Revenue per employee| $923,364| $872,647| $770,576| Quick ratio| . 96| 1. 03| . 95| Current ratio| 1. 3| 1. 39| 1. 33| Net current assets| 16. 97%| 22. 36%| 19. 28%| Long-term debt to equity| . 2| 1. 12| 2. 94| Total debt to equity| . 22| 1. 12| 2. 94| Interest coverage| —| —| 20. 47x| Total asset turnover| 2. 58x| 2. 74x| 2. 66x| Receivables turnover| 24. 95x| 26. 88x| 31. 83x| Inventory turnover| 11. 46x| 11. 06x| 11. 44x| Accounts payable turnover| 5. 98x| 6. 43x| 6. 73x| Property, plant and equipment turnover| 27. 36x| 29. 67x| 26. 61x| Cash and cash equivalents turnover| 5. 59x| 5. 78x| 5. 33x|